新訓心得(一)

好吧!先聲明一下這篇文章算是滿負面的想法。首先先來講軍中的生活，其實軍中的生活方式跟我以前去過的魔鬼訓練營很像，只不過在軍中體能上會非常的操，當然跟到什麼樣的連長操的程度就真的有差別，像我們連上就算是真的很操，至少跟這一營其他兩個連比起來，我們可以說是有天壤之別吧！不過就像阿毛說的，說真的操久了後，如果今天比昨天操得少，就會覺得今天比較涼；在剛開始會不適應，我想除了體騰上無法負荷以外，另一個最大的主因應該就是自己的時間真的非常的少，從早到晚真的有永無止盡的事等著去做，每天直到休息的前一刻，都還是繃緊神經的狀態；其實再累的生活方式，只要你找到了適應或調適的方法，你就會漸漸的習慣，再忙的生活，只要抓到了模式，就能從中忙裡偷閒。

故事到這裡就有了完美結局了嗎？當然不是，說真的，新環境只要時間久了，你就會自己慢慢的適應，但是觀念上的不適應，我想就算是時間再久，也無法去調整或配合；其實在入伍之前獲知後，我都一直覺得我當兵的意義就是去鍛鍊自己的體能以及去認識各種不同的朋友，這想法直到我們第一次上了靶場作射擊後，完全的顛覆了我的想法；在靶場當我聽到第一聲槍聲後，我整個人事非常的震驚，雖然在高中的時候就有做過實彈射擊，但是我那時並沒有太多的印象，而這次的實彈射擊，真的是讓我感到太震驚了，那子彈射出後的巨響以及對肩窩的撞擊，對我的腦中好像是一次次的擊打，腦中所思考的，並不是耳鳴所帶來的刺痛感，或是肩膀的疼痛，不斷在我腦海盤旋的是當這子彈打中人的情景；當打靶結束之後，旁邊的人紛紛開始討論自己射擊的成績，還有當有人說實彈射擊是最好玩的操課，而大家一起附合時，我只想問一句話：槍這種東西真的有這麼兒戲嗎？或許會有人說我很娘，但是射擊完的當下，我只覺得我恨透了這把槍，並且重新思考了這入伍從軍的意義。

在大家的觀念中男人入伍從軍、保家衛國是天經地義的事，當過兵後，就能讓你成唯一個真正的男人，這我不否認，在軍中確實能讓許多從未與父母脫離，並且從未獨自在外的人學習獨立，但是這都算是當兵的副屬而已，說白一點，當兵的主要意義就是訓練你成唯一部殺人機器，從射擊訓練，到刺槍術以及單兵訓練，這些都是教導你如何在作戰時，如何殺死敵人並且存活下來，"殺死敵人"，聽起來好像是個遊戲，只要幹掉敵人我們就會得到勝利。容我說一句，幹!!!!!!!!!現再提到的是一個活生生的人，不是遊戲裡面死掉以後還是可以釋放靈魂撿屍體的虛擬人物，在操課中做的任何動作練習都是為了殺人而做，難道大家都能夠這樣等閒視之嗎？不要說那麼多廢話，只要腳色互換一下，今天被射擊中的那個人，今天被刺槍刺中的那個人，不是敵人而是妳，這是一個多麼悲哀的話題，我不相信每個人都有那麼堅強的意志，當你面前站著一個活生生的人，一個上有高堂下有妻兒的"敵人"，而能輕描淡寫的扣下板機。或許會有人說，這麼多的廢話，每個人都像你一樣，那國家沒有軍人，是不是就等著別國來欺負好了；對，我承認，我就是沒有那麼的堅強，我就是沒有辦法承擔這沉重的包袱，或許又會有人認為我太小題大作，但這本來就是當兵的核心價值，你可以選擇視而不見，但是對我來說，這就是一層很大的陰影，我無法對其不去思考、不去揣摩。

隨筆

果然在苦悶的日子中，才會獲得文思泉湧的能力；在實例中又得到了驗證，不管如何，恭喜他啦！！

Cool

(轉)建立自己的迷你小城市
(同時轉貼自blog http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/reching_lin/ 另外還放了CGI做個人專屬的城市連接 點閱)這是一個讓玩家自己建立屬於自己小城市的小遊戲，他們玩法十分簡單，像網頁中的城市就是一個例子，每一個新的朋友(IP)觀看這張網頁就會增加這個城市的人口數喔！
進去後按右邊的"Build my city"
http://basaras-farm.myminicity.com/
下面的額外發展有人口數的限制喔!
像發展工業要50人.發展工業: (在網址後加上 /ind ) 需人口數: 50
http://basaras-farm.myminicity.com/ind發展交通: (在網址後加上 /tra ) 需人口數: 100
http://basaras-farm.myminicity.com/tra發展安全: (在網址後加上 /sec ) 需人口數: 300
http://basaras-farm.myminicity.com/sec發展環境: (在網址後加上 /env ) 需人口數: 500
http://basaras-farm.myminicity.com/env發展商業: (在網址後加上 /com ) 需人口數: 1000
http://basaras-farm.myminicity.com/com
大家亦不彷將你們的城市的網址post上來分享一下(因為越多人看過你的城市,你的城市就越豐富)

Every business, regardless of size, must carefully identify and plan its shorts and long term goals.More importantly, every business must attempt to strike a balance between the two and make sure that one dose not dominate the other. If some businesses want to get huge profits and quick returns, for example, by pirating name brands such as Christian Dior, Chanel, and Lancome, business relations are doubtless infected thoroughly with the disease of short-sighted motives. Fortunately, there is plenty of evidence suggesting that business often look well beyond short-term goals.

The desire to generate a profit lies at the heart of every business, and this desireis the chief element that prevent business from placing too much emphasis on short-term goals. In order to maintain a steady increase in profits, a company must continually upgrade its products or services, and this objective can be accomplished only by establishing long-term goals. These types of goals enable businesses to meet the future demands of their customers and not to fall behind the completition. Conversely, any business that focuses too much upon short-term srategies will not only minimize its profits, but also jeopardize its existece.

Issue No. 111 模擬

"A nation must maintain a highly competitive educational system--a system in which students compete among themselves and against students from other countries--to ensure its own economic success."


The claim in question is that if a nation is to ensure its own economic success, it must maintain a highly competitive educational system in which students compete among themselves and against students from other countries. I strongly disagree for the following reasons.

First of all, a country must be good at what it already dose, not at what other countries are good at doing. Only in this way will it be competitive. For example, consider two countries, A and B. Country A is good at producing bicycles very affordably and country B is good at manufacturing computers very affordably. The intelligent thing to do, guided by the above claim, would be to have everybody in country A schooled in computer science and everybody in country B schooled in the technology of bicycles. But this is pure nonsense, at least if trade flows freely between A and B. A will make (and sell) what it is good at making, and B will do the same.

In addition, different people learn in different ways, and what is good for the people of one country might not be good for the people of another. A highly competitive education in which students compete among themselves might work in one place but not in another. Furthermore, overemphasis on scholastic competition and high grades can undermine freedom of thought, something that a country needs if it is to be economically competitive. With freedom of thought comes inventiveness and originality, which are essential ingredients in any successful economy.

Finally, the success of a country depends not just on its economic performance. Part of its success depends also on its level of culture--its awareness of its own history, its appreciation for the arts, its love of books, and so forth. However wealthy a country is, it is something less than successful if it is devoid of culture. Evidently, a successful country must also educate its citizens about its culture-- a kind of education that has little to do with achieving economic success.

In summary, I strongly disagree with the claim that if a nation is to ensure its own economic success, it must maintain a highly competitive educational system in which students compete among themselves and against students from other countries. I strongly disagree because a country must be good at what it already dose, not at what other countries are good at doing. Moreover, different people learn in different ways, and what is good for the people of another country. Finally, the success of a country depends not just on its economic performance.

時間：40分鐘
字數：457