Tuesday, February 22, 2011
善良或自私
Monday, February 21, 2011
隨筆
Sunday, February 20, 2011
觸景
[轉錄] 關於傷害
作者: 我是大A
我們之所以要善待他人,在於傷害是不會消失的。
昨天在咖啡店裡,我一直想著這件事:時間不會解決一切。
時間會給的,只是詮釋權。比方說妳知道了他不愛妳,
妳為痛苦找到了出口,把放不下的心事打包。再去談一場戀愛。
可是傷害一直存在。心是身體的一部份,一旦經過了切合和縫補,
妳遇到了一個全新的人,在打電話找不到對方的時候,
傷害就像蕁麻疹。發過一次,就會存在血液裡,蓄勢待發。
而最無能為力的,是一旦一個人受過傷害,
於是妳不努力就放棄。不相信有人會真的喜歡妳。對方不知情,
可是一直到了現在,在幾度不想要被發現熱情敏感,
Saturday, February 12, 2011
單純
覆水難收
Monday, February 07, 2011
無奈
Thursday, February 03, 2011
Tuesday, February 01, 2011
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Saturday, January 29, 2011
隨筆
Friday, January 28, 2011
隨筆
Sunday, January 23, 2011
學習
Friday, January 21, 2011
隨筆
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Fairbanks驚魂記
又有種差一點就回不了家的感覺
今天其實是我農曆生日
Fairbanks非常冷 零下三十度也只是剛好而已
晚上想去Chena hot spring泡溫泉
去的時候還算順利
九點多要回來時 經過一段完全結冰的路
身為觀光客的我們自然是不知道
車子打滑得好嚴重
左右搖晃了好多次
最終還是沒控制了方向盤
打滑到旁邊雪地中
那瞬間我還真害怕整輛車翻過去
幸好有位好心人停下來救了我們
我是個只穿夾腳拖去泡溫泉的智障
走到雪地又冷又滑
在冰塊上摔了好大一跤
我聽到自己的叫聲是如此淒厲
從未用這種聲音跌倒過
頭跟脊椎很大的碰碰兩聲
猴子跟尼可很快過來救我
但我連動都動不了 依舊淒厲地叫著
幸好看起來是無恙
結果我們搭便車到附近的resort
下車之際居然忘了拿隨身行李
他們的手機護照錢包全都在裡面
沒有對方聯絡方式 手機也全部不通
完全是遇到山難的情形
終於 現在 我回到了住宿點
非常慶幸大難不死
現在完全明白 錢能解決的問題都是小問題
人平安就好
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
Sunday, August 22, 2010
東岸九日遊
第二天 維吉尼亞, Williamsburg NewPort News機場
抵達Yuji家
中餐: 越南菜
維吉尼亞, Norfolk Battleship Museum
搭船遊覽Battleship
晚餐: 燒烤酒吧
維吉尼亞, Williamsburg 住宿: Yuji家
第三天 維吉尼亞, Richmond 遊客中心
Virginia State Capitol
中餐: Vending
Museum & White House of the Confederacy
St John's Episcopal Church
The American Civil Center
Champs Elysees
維吉尼亞, Williamsburg 晚餐: Taka 家
住宿: Yuji家
第四天 維吉尼亞, Williamsburg College of William & Mary
Gray House bus: Williamsburg -> DC
華盛頓DC Kelly & Linda 接送
馬里蘭 中餐: Red Lobing
馬里蘭, Leonardtown 河邊小屋
晚餐: Aunt 家 (螃蟹 牛排)
住宿: Aunt家
第五天 馬里蘭, Leonardtown 早餐: Wawa
華盛頓DC 開車前往地鐵並搭乘前往DC
Library of Congress
Capitol (tour & Senate)
Library of Congress(get inside)
中餐: Hamburger
Air & Space Museum
Art Museum
Spy Museum
馬里蘭 晚餐: Bonefish
馬里蘭, Leonardtown 住宿: Aunt家
第六天 馬里蘭, Leonardtown 搭Bus前往DC
華盛頓DC Bureau of Engraving & Printing
Linciln Memorial
Washington Monument
White House
Union Station
中餐: Jonny Rocket
維吉尼亞, Tysons Corner Shopping Mall
晚餐: Mexican food
住宿: Fairfield Inn
第七天 維吉尼亞 Dulles Airport搭機前往紐奧良
路易斯安納, New Orleans Sheraton Hotel
遊客中心
Jackson Sqare
中餐: Po Boy
蠟像館
Louisuana State Museum
French Market
Riverwalk Marketplace
晚餐: Popeye
Preservation Hall
住宿: Sheraton Hotel
第八天 路易斯安納, New Orleans Swamp Tours
中餐: Hamburg
Garden District
Tulane University
Sheraton Hotel(Football Game)
晚餐: Po Boy
住宿: Sheraton Hotel
第九天 路易斯安納, New Orleans Louis Armstrong Airport
亞利桑那, 鳳凰城 Sky Harbor Airport
Thursday, July 29, 2010
比較
(Con): 有可能需要五個學期、花費較多、
Accelerated(Pro): 四個學期結束(每學期課業較輕)、花費較少、
(Con): 需要先修Bootcamp、不可選擇海外修課、
這是一個艱難的決定
Thursday, May 27, 2010
苦惱
Thursday, April 01, 2010
Thursday, January 21, 2010
隨筆
到底我該相信什麼,又該信仰什麼......
Monday, January 11, 2010
隨筆
我是認為一段維持很久的感情,若是受到外在因素的干擾因而分手的,這是多麼可惜的一件事,或許你們都認為,在一起或分手只是一件稀鬆平常的事,但是對當事人卻是多麼的重要,這代表著多年經營的感情,只因不可抗拒的因素,就這樣不了了之;對你們來說,談戀愛只是芝麻蒜皮的小事,但是沒有這樣在一起的磨合,草草率率的結婚後,才發現兩個人根本不適合在一起,這樣不是更糟糕。
Thursday, December 24, 2009
隨筆
原來我的要求太過分,
原來都只是我一廂情願,
原來甚麼東西都需要等價交換......
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Saturday, October 17, 2009
隨筆
(兩個禮拜讀書時間<五小時) + 每天像個喜憨兒一樣期待 = 智障
Friday, September 11, 2009
隨筆
"你怎麼知道你到底愛不愛她?"
"我不知道,但我只知道跟她在一起的每一天都是快樂的"
Sunday, July 12, 2009
很酷的小遊戲:Ikariam
遊戲類型有點像世紀帝國,就是有要採集各種資源,然後建立自己的軍隊,不過是個可以讓你玩好幾年的傳家遊戲,因為它是網頁類型遊戲,隨便蓋個東西都馬是以小時為單位,不過好處就是你只要每天上去點幾下,不用花太多時間,就可以慢慢建立你的領地,感覺內容也滿豐富的,是個值得慢慢玩的小遊戲;至於我是在台5伺服器(Epsilon),因為這裡面有滿多可以分工合作的,歡迎大家來找我玩,我的位置在(83,63)紫汀嶼,還有(61,56)春日部,記得來找我阿!!
Saturday, July 11, 2009
Sunday, June 14, 2009
隨筆
「每個人的目的都不同,我只是希望能夠忘卻所有的煩惱」
「而我卻是希望能夠與你分享成就的喜悅」
Saturday, May 02, 2009
勇氣
我承認當我面對這些抉擇的時候,我無法很果斷的說我一定能抗拒這些誘惑,我真的很害怕自己內心深處的貪婪會將自己的理智吞噬,因此我總是希望從你那兒得到些勇氣,這也就是為甚麼今天我會這麼急切的希望你能夠表態。
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
隨筆
Friday, April 17, 2009
命運好好玩
對!這只是個遊戲而已,如果你覺得我只會在這方面做文章的話,那你就太不了解我了......
Thursday, March 26, 2009
隨筆
To do or not to do, that is a question......
Thursday, February 19, 2009
對牛彈琴
唉,牛牽到北京還是牛......
Monday, January 26, 2009
悶
祝咬咬
Sunday, August 10, 2008
新訓心得(一)
故事到這裡就有了完美結局了嗎?當然不是,說真的,新環境只要時間久了,你就會自己慢慢的適應,但是觀念上的不適應,我想就算是時間再久,也無法去調整或配合;其實在入伍之前獲知後,我都一直覺得我當兵的意義就是去鍛鍊自己的體能以及去認識各種不同的朋友,這想法直到我們第一次上了靶場作射擊後,完全的顛覆了我的想法;在靶場當我聽到第一聲槍聲後,我整個人事非常的震驚,雖然在高中的時候就有做過實彈射擊,但是我那時並沒有太多的印象,而這次的實彈射擊,真的是讓我感到太震驚了,那子彈射出後的巨響以及對肩窩的撞擊,對我的腦中好像是一次次的擊打,腦中所思考的,並不是耳鳴所帶來的刺痛感,或是肩膀的疼痛,不斷在我腦海盤旋的是當這子彈打中人的情景;當打靶結束之後,旁邊的人紛紛開始討論自己射擊的成績,還有當有人說實彈射擊是最好玩的操課,而大家一起附合時,我只想問一句話:槍這種東西真的有這麼兒戲嗎?或許會有人說我很娘,但是射擊完的當下,我只覺得我恨透了這把槍,並且重新思考了這入伍從軍的意義。
在大家的觀念中男人入伍從軍、保家衛國是天經地義的事,當過兵後,就能讓你成唯一個真正的男人,這我不否認,在軍中確實能讓許多從未與父母脫離,並且從未獨自在外的人學習獨立,但是這都算是當兵的副屬而已,說白一點,當兵的主要意義就是訓練你成唯一部殺人機器,從射擊訓練,到刺槍術以及單兵訓練,這些都是教導你如何在作戰時,如何殺死敵人並且存活下來,"殺死敵人",聽起來好像是個遊戲,只要幹掉敵人我們就會得到勝利。容我說一句,幹!!!!!!!!!現再提到的是一個活生生的人,不是遊戲裡面死掉以後還是可以釋放靈魂撿屍體的虛擬人物,在操課中做的任何動作練習都是為了殺人而做,難道大家都能夠這樣等閒視之嗎?不要說那麼多廢話,只要腳色互換一下,今天被射擊中的那個人,今天被刺槍刺中的那個人,不是敵人而是妳,這是一個多麼悲哀的話題,我不相信每個人都有那麼堅強的意志,當你面前站著一個活生生的人,一個上有高堂下有妻兒的"敵人",而能輕描淡寫的扣下板機。或許會有人說,這麼多的廢話,每個人都像你一樣,那國家沒有軍人,是不是就等著別國來欺負好了;對,我承認,我就是沒有那麼的堅強,我就是沒有辦法承擔這沉重的包袱,或許又會有人認為我太小題大作,但這本來就是當兵的核心價值,你可以選擇視而不見,但是對我來說,這就是一層很大的陰影,我無法對其不去思考、不去揣摩。
Wednesday, March 05, 2008
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Cool
(同時轉貼自blog http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/reching_lin/ 另外還放了CGI做個人專屬的城市連接 點閱)這是一個讓玩家自己建立屬於自己小城市的小遊戲,他們玩法十分簡單,像網頁中的城市就是一個例子,每一個新的朋友(IP)觀看這張網頁就會增加這個城市的人口數喔!
進去後按右邊的"Build my city"
http://basaras-farm.myminicity.com/
下面的額外發展有人口數的限制喔!
像發展工業要50人.發展工業: (在網址後加上 /ind ) 需人口數: 50
http://basaras-farm.myminicity.com/ind發展交通: (在網址後加上 /tra ) 需人口數: 100
http://basaras-farm.myminicity.com/tra發展安全: (在網址後加上 /sec ) 需人口數: 300
http://basaras-farm.myminicity.com/sec發展環境: (在網址後加上 /env ) 需人口數: 500
http://basaras-farm.myminicity.com/env發展商業: (在網址後加上 /com ) 需人口數: 1000
http://basaras-farm.myminicity.com/com
大家亦不彷將你們的城市的網址post上來分享一下(因為越多人看過你的城市,你的城市就越豐富)
Tuesday, January 08, 2008
The desire to generate a profit lies at the heart of every business, and this desireis the chief element that prevent business from placing too much emphasis on short-term goals. In order to maintain a steady increase in profits, a company must continually upgrade its products or services, and this objective can be accomplished only by establishing long-term goals. These types of goals enable businesses to meet the future demands of their customers and not to fall behind the completition. Conversely, any business that focuses too much upon short-term srategies will not only minimize its profits, but also jeopardize its existece.
Friday, January 04, 2008
Issue No. 111 模擬
The claim in question is that if a nation is to ensure its own economic success, it must maintain a highly competitive educational system in which students compete among themselves and against students from other countries. I strongly disagree for the following reasons.
First of all, a country must be good at what it already dose, not at what other countries are good at doing. Only in this way will it be competitive. For example, consider two countries, A and B. Country A is good at producing bicycles very affordably and country B is good at manufacturing computers very affordably. The intelligent thing to do, guided by the above claim, would be to have everybody in country A schooled in computer science and everybody in country B schooled in the technology of bicycles. But this is pure nonsense, at least if trade flows freely between A and B. A will make (and sell) what it is good at making, and B will do the same.
In addition, different people learn in different ways, and what is good for the people of one country might not be good for the people of another. A highly competitive education in which students compete among themselves might work in one place but not in another. Furthermore, overemphasis on scholastic competition and high grades can undermine freedom of thought, something that a country needs if it is to be economically competitive. With freedom of thought comes inventiveness and originality, which are essential ingredients in any successful economy.
Finally, the success of a country depends not just on its economic performance. Part of its success depends also on its level of culture--its awareness of its own history, its appreciation for the arts, its love of books, and so forth. However wealthy a country is, it is something less than successful if it is devoid of culture. Evidently, a successful country must also educate its citizens about its culture-- a kind of education that has little to do with achieving economic success.
In summary, I strongly disagree with the claim that if a nation is to ensure its own economic success, it must maintain a highly competitive educational system in which students compete among themselves and against students from other countries. I strongly disagree because a country must be good at what it already dose, not at what other countries are good at doing. Moreover, different people learn in different ways, and what is good for the people of another country. Finally, the success of a country depends not just on its economic performance.
時間:40分鐘
字數:457
Friday, December 21, 2007
Issue No. 114 模擬
It is sometimes difficult to discuss people's views about whether the most effective way for managers to assign work is to divide complex tasks into their simpler component parts, because it is such a multifaceted question. While the first reaction of some people may be to disagree with this statement, I feel it is worthy of deeper consideration. In my opinion, there are three reasons to agree with this statement.
First of all, breaking a complex task down into its parts and assigning each part to a certain worker (or group of workers) takes advantage of the fact that different people have different skills. For instance, the complex task of putting up a high-rise building might require as many as hundred sets of skills, or trades such as electricians, pipe fitters, insulators, and crane operators. One part of the job would call for qualifications in electrical work, still another in crane operating, and so forth.
In addition, by providing a complex task into its component parts, the very job of overseeing this task becomes that much more manageable. For example, in delegating different parts of the job to different groups of works, it becomes that much easier for the supervisor to schedule and monitor the output of each group. If one part of the job is behind schedule, the supervisor will know which group to single out as being responsible for the delay. Beside, of another part is ahead of schedule, then he will know which group to praise. Indeed, in delegating different portion of the job to those in charge of the various trades, the supervisor dose not have to get bogged down with trying to "micro-manage" the details of the task.
Finally, when a task is broken down into its parts and each part is assigned to a certain worker (or group of workers), it is easier to complete the job on time. Consider, again, the construction of a high-rise building, and how long it would take if the electrical work could not begin until the plumbing was completed, and the heating ducts could not be installed until the electrical work was completed. Consider, by contrast, how much faster it would be when the wiring, plumbing, and heating ducts could be installed at more or less the same time by the different trade workers. It is when a complex task is broken down into clearly distinctive parts that it becomes possible to plan for having different trade workers working on different parts of the job at the same time.
In summary, for the reasons and example just cited, I firmly believe that the most effective way to manage a complex task is to divide it into its component parts. The approach makes the most of the fact that different people have different skills. Furthermore, it also makes the task of managing much easier. Finally, this approach to a complex task shortens the time it takes to complete the task.
時間:45分鐘
字數:526
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Issue No.121 模擬
It is always a controversial issue whether technology separates and alienates people more than it serves to bring them together. From my point of view, technology has done more to bring people together than to separate or alienate them. Therefore, I disagree with the statement. Here are some reasons why.
First of all, technology has brought about a revolution in the way we communicate with each other through the use of cellular phones and the Internet. Thanks to these new mediums of communication, people are brought closer together. With access to cellular phones or the Internet, I am now only seconds away from communicating with distant friends. With access to these devices, the geographical distance between acquaintances matters much less than it did in the past. I can still maintain close contact with my family and friends, even if they are on the other side of the world. Evidently, technology makes people become closer than ever.
In addition, technology has given us the means to travel great distances in relatively short periods of time for a relatively cheap price. Imagine having to travel overseas to visit your parents had you all lived a mere hundred year ago. Think of both the time and money such a trip would have cost! Now compare the difficulties of this trip a century ago with the relative ease and comfort of the same trip today. The technical innovations in transportation, as well as in communication, have only served to bring us closer together.
In summary, I strongly disagree with the worn-out idea that technology ultimately separates and alienates people more than it serves to bring them together. To the contrary, technology improves our ability to talk to each other. Also, it improves our ability to travel and see each other. Apparently, technological innovations in both transportation and in communication that were noted in the preceding paragraphs unite people in different locations.
字數:331
時間:31分鐘
Monday, December 10, 2007
Issue No.137 模擬
The issue is whether organizations should place greater value on the advice only from their own highly experienced employees rather than on the advice of outside experts. For the following reasons, I strongly disagree with the company they work for.
First of all, although the employees can be just as capable as the outside experts, what they lack is objectivity. Just as an author is not very capable of reviewing his/her own works, he/she needs independent outside editors to review the works impartially. If the situation involved the opinion of inexperienced outside people against the opinion of the employees, of course, the outside opinion should be discounted. However, as experts, they should be just as technically knowledgeable as the employees of the particular organization should. Presumably, the experts have studied the particular industry or organization and are able to comment on facts or figures objectively.
In addition, employees are attached to the company they work for and are less able than experts to view current company prospects effectively. For example, if a company is doing its share as the dominant industry leader, its employees are unwilling to believe the news and/or try to put a good spin on the bad news. Their jobs and livelihood are at stake if the company is losing money; therefore, they cannot see the complete picture as clearly as an outside expert who gives advice based on the facts.
In conclusion, independent experts are more capable of giving more realistic advice, whether good or bad in nature, than employees can, since employees tend to be optimists. Besides, most employees are not very effective in looking at the plain facts and figure; they bring biases and emotions into the picture.
時間:29分鐘
字數:311
Sunday, December 09, 2007
Issue No. 142 模擬
The assertion in question is that employees should not be asked to provide formal evaluations of their supervisor's performance. I disagree with this assertion for the following three reasons.
First of all, employees are in fact competent to evaluate the performance of their supervisor. It is nonsense to suggest that they have little basis for judging a supervisor's performance. More than anybody else, it is the people working directly "below" the supervisor who are in a position to assess his performance. Obviously, it is they who are most familiar with the work environment overseen by their supervisor. With a first-hand understanding of their jobs, they are perfectly competent to judge him on such relevant matters as team leadership and clarity of communication.
In addition, a formal evaluation of a supervisor reflects how is viewed by his subordinates. These evaluations do more than provide information for his employers: they also provide him with valuable information as well - such as guidance on how he might improve himself as a supervisor. Even those evaluations that he deems mistaken or unfair can prove to be important, if only for the simple reason that they alert him to a misunderstanding between his subordinates and himself that should be cleared up.
Finally, a formal evaluation of a supervisor gets the employees to think about their relation to their supervisor in a fairly intelligent way. With an official way in which to communicate their concerns in writing, they have to articulate them in a constructive way. Moreover, without any official mechanism by which to communicate their grievances, their talk may turn into vicious gossip. Besides, with a means to communicate their concerns at their disposal, they have less reason to whine that "Nobody listen to us."
In summary, I disagree with the assertion that employees should not be asked to provide formal evaluations of their supervisor. First, the argument is simply false that they have no basis for the supervisor as to how he might improve himself in the job. Finally, with an official mechanism of communicating in place, the employees are encouraged to criticize in a constructive way.
字數:377
時間:35分鐘
Sunday, September 02, 2007
隨筆
Friday, August 31, 2007
Issue 1
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your position with reasons and/or examples from your experience, observation, or reading.
Views differ greatly when it comes to the issue of whether there are essentially two forces which are self-interest and fear that motivate people. While some people consider that everyone is selfish, others hold the view that people have good side. My personal experience and actual observations of life have led me to strongly maintain that self-interest and fear are essentially to forces that motivate people.
First of all, economist has said that everyone is self-interest, and it can make economy have optimal situation. Although people might think that the man who is selfish is not popular, they do not actually know what their daily life is full of selfish behaviors. Even the easier thing in daily life like buying, no one wants to buy expensive thing if it can be got cheaper one. Someone might say that there are still lots of people who donate their fortune and do not get gain any reward. At first glance, it seems that these people do not want get any repay, but after deeply though it can be found that they are still the selfish people. For example, lots of corporations contribute fund to build the hospital. It seems that they really want to contribute to their country. However, more money they donate, more reduction of tax they can get. Furthermore, administering a hospital is also a way to make money.
In addition, people are not only motivated by self-interest but also by fear. It is instinctive for people to avoid any dangerous situation or hazard. Even infant knows that using crying to express fear and avoid it. Furthermore, people fear beast so that they build the house. People fear hungry so that they cultivate rice. In society with legal system, the reason why people legislate against violent is a good example to demonstrate that people are motivated by fear.
In summary, on the basis of the reasons presented above, I must wholeheartedly agree that self-interest and fear are essentially to forces that motivate people. We can say that the best reason to explain every human does is self-interest and fear.
Thursday, August 23, 2007
Argument 2
“Across town in the Park Hill district, the Thespian Theater, Pizzazz Pizza, and the Niblick Golf Club have all had business increase within the past two years. Capital Ideal should therefore invest in the Roxy Playhouse , the Slice-o’-Pizza, and the Divot Golf Club, three new business in the Irongate district. As a condition, we should require them to participate in a special program: Any customer who patronizes two of the business will receive a substantial discount at the third. By motivating customers to patronize all three, we will thus contribute to the profitability of each and maximize our return.”
In this plan, the writer recommends that Capital Idea should invest in the Roxy Playhouse, the Slice-o'-Pizza, and the Divot Golf Club, three new businesses in the Irongate district, and participate in a special program. In support of this recommendation, he points out that in the Park Hill district, the same businesses have all had account increases within the past two years. While the plan seem to be somewhat convincing at first glance, a deeper investigation will reveal that the recommendation does not take into account the unique condition of every district. Doubtless, faulty analogy makes the argument problematic in several respect.
First of all, the writer cites that the Thespian Theater, Pizzazz Pizza, and the Niblick Golf Club across town in the Park Hill district have all had business increases within the past two years. However, he forgets to compare difference between two districts. Whether it is a residential district or industrial estate, different type of ditrict has totally different strategy of investment. For example, Park Hill district might be a residential district. Thus, the residents are going to have fun at those entertaining businesses, and make those businesses increase. Yet, if the Irongate district is a industrial estate, the final result would be reverse. Needless to say, no one wants to have fun there. According to this assumption, it is not a good idea to invest in the Irongate district.
In addition, the author also recommends that any customer who patronize two of the businesses will receive a substantial discount at the third. Nevertheless, not every customer has enough money to consume three of their businesses. For instance, playing golf needs some equipments which are not afforded for everybody. Furthermore, each of business has their own customer, some are teenages and some are elder. The younger might rather go to theather than play golf. On the other hand, the elder might not like eat pizza because of teeth. Therefore, deeper investigation is nescessery to support this recommendation.
In summary, the writer should reconsider his plan, and look for more evidence to support his position. He uses incredibly circumstantial evidence to make a plan on investing three new businesses in the Irongate district. Only one district booming last two year does not mean it will success everywhere. Therefore, it does not makes me find this plan well-reasoned.
Sunday, August 19, 2007
有感
Wednesday, August 15, 2007
Argument 1
In this article, the writter says that the Cumquat Cafe has made a mistake in moving to the new address.In support of this argument, he points out that while Hippocrene Plumbing Supply has apparently benn quite successful by opening a wholesale outlet in the location once occupied by the Cumquat Cafe Restaurant, the Cumquat Cafe, one year after moving to its new location , has seen its volume of business drop somewhat from the previous year's. However, I do not think the argument is logiclly convincing because some of the premises on which its conclusion rests are highly questionable. Here are some reasoms why.
First of all, the argument wrongly assumes that the company Hippocrene Plumbing Supply and Cumquat Cafe Restaurant are analogous.Because they have totally different competors, it can not compare their profit directly.For instance, if the location now occupied by the Hippocrene Plumbing Supply is lack of wholesale outlet , comsumers might have no choice but comsumig at new opening wholesale outlet. However, if the location nearby is full of cafe restaurant, the Cumquat Cafe Restaurant has to compete with other rivals. In this situation, the Cumquat Cafe Restaurant does not make a mistake in moving to find a better business location where has less same business competors.
In addition, the editorial does not look at the economical condition surrounding the whole world. Perhaps, the whole world had ressesion or serious inflation in last year.Therefore, the Cumquat Cafe which has seen its volume of business drop somewhat from the previous year's does not mean having made a wrong decision. Furthemore, the Cumquat Cafe Restaurant just has business in new location in first year. Thus, it probably isn't popular there. Comparing to the past, the restaurant had more constantly comsumer than now.If the Cumquat Cafe Restaurant has some advertisement or discount this year, it might make restaurant more comsumers.
In summary, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis dose not lend strong support to what the author claims. Even if the Cumquat Cafe Restaurant's business has drop, the writter still can not clonclue that the company has made a mistake. To strengthen the argument, the author would have to consider all other possible factors that affect the companys' business and the surrounding condition near two location.
Sunday, April 22, 2007
[轉錄]世界上有兩種人
一種人的心本身就是飽滿的
只是有個最特別的位置
等著放一張最特別的椅子
給一個最特別的人坐
而另外一種人
他們的心卻是
天生就被鏤刻了一個位置
同樣等著給一個最特別的人坐
第一種人
他們本身就是完整的
他們自己就可以活得很快樂
等到那個特別的人真的出現時
他們會活得更開心
可是第二種人呢
在那個最特別的人出現前
他們都要忍受著心上的一個洞
無法停止的感受到一種空缺寂寞和蕭索
他們努力的轉移注意力
在白天和朋友狂歡出去逛街看看書看看電影
也可以暫時說服自己生活是美好的
但是每到晚上月光從窗口偷偷的流瀉進來的時候
才發現地上的陰影是多麼的破碎而不完整
你是第一種人還是第二種人
往往是天生的
就算不甘心也很難改變
誰想要天生就帶著一個缺口呢
而缺口的形狀是那麼獨特
除了真愛的人以外學業家庭友情事業是很難完全填補它的
可能可以硬塞上去吧
但是密不密合貼不貼切
自己感受的到......
第二種人又可細分為兩型
第一型叫做要坐不坐隨緣型
第二型叫做削足適履型
怎麼說
第一型的人不管天生被鏤刻的座椅是流線形還是人體工學椅
他不會為了要配合要坐的人而改變自己的形狀
若是無法完全契合
可能幾次的衝突爭執後他會收回那個人坐的權利
反正他不適合可能有更天生訂作的人
但是
第二型的人呢
他們心上也有著獨一無二的形狀
但是他們更傻他們會為了認定的人改變自己心的形狀
今天他們不輕易放人走近他們的心
可是一旦有人穿越重重關卡解開了一道道鎖
那麼那個人將是全世界擁有最大權利的人
今天不管那個人是正是方是扁是圓
第二型的人永遠會改變自己去配合那個人
有時是對自己施加壓力
有時是強迫自己削去菱角
甚至
有時是拿著刀一片片的把多餘的部分都割掉
自傲自尊驕縱任性這時候都可以不要
只為了再下一次的見面時
可以若無其事的微笑對那個人說:
"你看我們不是天生一對嗎?"
夜裏流血的痛楚動刀時內心的掙扎與恐懼
都抵不過更強大的一股愛的力量
世界上有為了自己愛的人像刻木頭一樣拿刀刻自己更傻的事嗎
沒有
但是世界上有為了愛人改變自己堅持了半輩子的個性習慣更幸福的事嗎
沒有
這是愛情
==================================================
如果
你知道身邊有朋友是第二種人
拜託不要責怪他不獨立不要責怪他沒有愛情活不下去
他若是可以也很想活得瀟灑點的
如果
你知道那個人不但是第二種人還是其中的第二型
拜託不要罵他每次交一個男(女)朋友就好像重新誕生一次
分手離開時又好像死了一次
他很辛苦的
每一次的真愛他為了對方裁切自己的心
被拋棄時被切割得零零落落的心是那麼無助與悲哀
陪伴他
安慰他
鼓勵他
讓他流光血後還有力氣長出新肉還有力量去等待下一個人
如果剛剛好
愛你的人就是這樣的一個愛情傻子
請好好珍惜他(她)吧
在別人眼裡這樣的他可能不聰明甚至還有些愚蠢
但是對他來說愛你(妳)
一切都值得
每一分每一秒都是永恆
他絕對不可能想像除了你(妳)還有別人
別讓他在離開你(妳)後剩下的是一顆破碎不堪的心.....
最後
如果如果
你自己就是那第二種人中的第二型(唉)
只能跟你說......
你不孤單
現代社會中的愛情傻子也許不多了
當是當傻子碰上傻子
現代社會中的愛情傻子也許不多了
當是當傻子碰上傻子
那就會是全宇宙最大的幸福^_________________________^
Thursday, April 19, 2007
隨筆
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Response
Friday, April 13, 2007
情緒
隨筆
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Thursday, March 08, 2007
隨筆
Monday, February 26, 2007
Wednesday, February 07, 2007
抱怨
Friday, January 26, 2007
短篇
Thursday, January 25, 2007
隨筆
分享
Dennis DeYoung
Babe, I'm leaving, I must be on my way
The time is drawing near
My train is going, I see it in your eyes
The love, the need, your tears
But I'll be lonely without you
And I'll need your love to see me through
Please believe me, my heart is in your hands
And I'll be missing you.
You know it's you Babe
Whenever I get and I've had enough
Feel like giving up
You know it's you Babe
Giving me the courage and the strength I need
Please believe that it's true
Babe, I love you.
Babe, I'm leaving, I'll say it once again
Somehow try to smile
I know the feeling we're trying to forget
If only for a while
But I'll be lonely without you
And I'll need your love to see me through
Please believe me, my heart is in your hands
And I'll be missing you
Babe, I love you.
Tuesday, January 23, 2007
表揚
Sunday, January 21, 2007
短篇
Thursday, January 18, 2007
隨筆
隨筆
、彈奏樂器或日常生活中的瑣碎技藝,當他們能在眾多人當中能脫穎而出時,總讓我抱以欽佩的眼光,羨慕有著這樣的技能真好,同時也會反問自己,自己是否也是有同樣令人欽佩的技能呢?思考自己有什麼得天獨厚的技藝,努力去將它栽培成萬中選一的驕子,或許這就是你出社會能脫穎而出的機會也說不定。而當在為了未來的定位煩惱躊躇不移的時候,何不反過來想想,現在的自己在未來出社會將會缺乏什麼,並且如何去填補這些空缺,在補強自己的同時,說不定自己所要的答案就會慢慢浮現;當你消極且步履闌珊的漫步行走時,何不積極的胯開大步向前追逐;當你怨聲載道的抱怨現況的不滿,何不把握當下努力過好每分每秒。好吧,我承認說比做容易多了。
短篇
Saturday, January 13, 2007
隨筆
Friday, January 12, 2007
隨筆
隨筆
短篇
Thursday, January 11, 2007
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
長篇
一直以來,牌桌上是他最大的表演舞台,他永遠是這個場上的最大贏家,至少在他尚未登上舞台前,他一直如此深信著,在初登板的幾場小比賽也確實如此,直到首次的公開大型比賽,他躍躍欲試,一想到這次的焠鍊之後,接著就是平步青雲的康莊大道,他如是的沉醉在自己的幻想之中,但是卻沒想到在他夢醒後,擺在他眼前的是慘敗的殘酷事實,他悻悻然的誓言他將捲土重來,因為,他還年輕,他有的是本錢,他確信自己缺的只是命運之神的眷顧;但是在接下來的比賽中,他卻像著了魔似的屢戰屢敗,他的信念岌岌可危,甚至他不禁懷疑究竟在勝利的那端,會是什麼樣的東西在等著他,什麼樣的東西值得他一再的面對挫折;這次的出賽,他的內心做了相當大的掙扎,經過這麼多年的墮落,他究竟還有沒有資格出來角逐,他究竟還有沒有那份心力來面對,不管是面對失敗或是勝利。
看了看坐在自己面前的這位對手,不怎麼起眼,但是卻是感到無比的巨大,那迎面而來的無形壓力,使得他快喘不過氣來,看著他與著身旁的人談笑風聲,一副完全不把對手放在眼裡的姿態,多年的經驗告訴他,這絕對是場硬仗;看著自己泛黃且佈滿皺摺的雙手,他知道自己時日不多,這一戰或許是他的最後一博,不過老天似乎對他給予憐憫的眼光,特別派幸運之神眷顧了他;只要這雙手一推出去,截然不同的兩個劇本將等著他來上演,成者,將可登上他夢寐以求的境地,榮耀與光榮般的生活,敗者,他將一無所有,繼續回到他遊民般的生活;他的戰友在賽前不斷叮嚀著他,似乎預見了這個場面,"有機會就拚吧"似乎仍不絕於耳,但是他的內心深處卻不斷的湧現出恐懼感,不為什麼,因為失敗的挫折早已侵蝕了他所有的意識,他的經驗早已令他自主反射的遠離所有失敗的狀態;他緩緩的坐起身來,整整了被他壓皺的衣裳,裝得一附從容的模樣,他知道就算在這重要的時刻,他仍不能亂了他的儀表,不管輸贏,他都要風風光光的,但是,在這高傲的外表底下,內心的混亂與交戰不斷的襲捲著他,這把到底該不該一博...........
Monday, January 08, 2007
分享
你的手心是我的天空
你的不安是我的惡夢
我放大你每一個感受 不需要理由
你一秒是我的一分鐘
你一步我就踏上雲朵
這種感覺你永遠不懂
只為證明你屬於我
你愛過的人 我就會想要變成她
她能做的我不懷疑能做的更多
你離開的人 我發誓不犯同樣的錯
一開始我就失去了自己
從開始我就不像我自己
愛 讓我辛苦得如此快樂
可是你都不了解我
每個細心的女生都會有一本隨身的筆記本
寫下為愛情做的每件事 每一頁都有傷痕
或許我很會勸別人 可是我卻做不到
只要是關於你 我都願意..
不必懷疑 你愛過的人 我就會想要變成她
她能給的我不懷疑能給的更多
你離開的人 我發誓不犯同樣的錯
一開始我就決定屬於你
你的手心是我的天空
你的不安是我的惡夢
我放大你每一個感受 不需要理由
你一秒是我的一分鐘
你一步我就踏上雲朵
這種感覺你永遠不懂
只為證明你屬於我
James Morrison - You Give Me Something(2e2jx)
You want to stay with me in the morning
You only hold me when I sleep、
I was meant to tread the water
Now Ive gotten in too deep、
For every piece of me that wants you
Another piece backs away.
Cause you give me something
That makes me scared、alright、
This could be nothing
But Im willing to give it a try、
Please give me something
Cause someday I might know my heart.
You already waited up for hours
Just to spend a little time alone with me、
And I can say Ive never bought you flowers
I cant work out what the mean、
I never thought that Id love someone、
That was someone elses dream.
Cause you give me something
That makes me scared、alright、
This could be nothing
But Im willing to give it a try、
Please give me something、
Cause someday I might call you from my heart、
But it might me a second too late、
And the words I could never say
Gonna come out anyway.
Cause you give me something
That makes me scared、alright、
This could be nothing
But Im willing to give it a try、
Please give me something、
Cause you give me something
That makes me scared、alright、
This could be nothing
But Im willing to give it a try、
Please give me something
Cause someday I might know my heart.
Know my heart、know my heart、know my heart
Sunday, January 07, 2007
隨筆
Thursday, January 04, 2007
隨筆
短篇
隨筆
Wednesday, January 03, 2007
台東行
08:10 數統小考
10:00 育樂街集合
10:28 台南高雄電車行
14:12 到達台東
14:30 租車
15:00 醬普家check in
16:00 知本溫泉
18:00 醬普媽媽親下廚
22:30 望園泡茶
DAY2
03:00 回醬普家繼續戰
05:00 出發看日出
06:10 金針山
06:36 沒探出頭的日出
08:00 早餐
08:30 回籠覺
13:00 醬普媽媽第二餐
14:30 準備往海線出發
15:30 小野柳
16:40 水往上流
17:10 泰源餵猴子
18:30 東河包子
19:00 富岡海產
DAY3
06:40 莒光號回台北
14:30 回台北家
Thursday, December 28, 2006
Tuesday, December 26, 2006
隨筆
Sunday, December 24, 2006
心得
隨筆
Saturday, December 23, 2006
Friday, December 22, 2006
Tuesday, December 19, 2006
隨筆
Monday, December 18, 2006
隨筆
Sunday, December 17, 2006
Monday, December 04, 2006
賀

這次的文管盃很神奇的我們拿下了冠軍,真的是讓其他隊跌破了眼鏡,不過也一雪我們時常被當成進補對象的嘔氣,但是我們絕對是貨真價實的第一名,平常的苦練,終於在這次的比賽展現,說真的這幾場比賽真的讓我打的很享受,大家流暢的守備再加上連貫起來的打擊,我們真的是個TEAM阿,我們隊長說的好"我們是一個團隊,光靠一兩個人強是沒用的,當隊上每一個小齒輪漸漸磨合,共同的默契培養出來了,產生的力量是不容小覷的",就是靠著這股氣勢,原本在預賽輸給交管系,到最後冠亞軍賽再次遇到都能壓著對方打;這幾場比賽我的心態上也改變許多,原本都打第三棒或第五棒的我,這次首次擔任第四棒的位置,但是原本喜歡幹大支的習慣卻也跟著調整過來,變成確實把球揮平,只要有安打把打擊貫連就好,果然效果真的很不錯,我們中心打線串連起來的攻擊真的很猛,這次打第四棒繳出了漂亮的成績,雖然長打率不高,但是打點跟打擊率都是最高,只要靠著這股氣勢,接下來大統盃奪冠也絕對不是夢,因為WE ARE THE CHAMPION。
Friday, November 24, 2006
隨筆
Friday, October 20, 2006
分享
http://0rz.tw/8f1Ye
Don't cry to me
If you loved me
You would be here with me
You want me
Come find me
Make up your mind
Should have let you fall
Lose it all
So maybe you can remember yourself
Can't keep believing we're only deceiving ourselves
And I'm sick of the lie
And you're too late
Don't cry to me
If you loved me
You would be here with me
You want me
Come find me
Make up your mind
Couldn't take the blame
Sick with shame
Must be exhausting to lose your own game
Selfishly hated
No wonder you're jaded
You can't play the victim this time
And you're too late
So don't cry to me
If you loved me
You would be here with me
You want me
Come find me
Make up your mind
You never call me when you're sober
You only want it cause it's over - It's over
How could I have burned paradise
How could I - You were never mine
So don't cry to me
If you loved me
You would be here with me
Don't lie to me
Just get your things
I've made up your mind







